For making assessments for IP clarification of componentized Intellectual Property rights of contributors, and roles and responsibilities of stakeholders:
Identify purpose and intent of Grameen Foundation, USA ( a 501c(3) US organisation, (with sister legal bodies in India, Ghana, Kenya, Philippines, Uganda) for assigning and transferring an open source Intellectual Property to a restricted 501c(3) organisation, without legal bases in jurisdictions outside USA?
What are the solution licensing and third party open source licensing compatibility practices, followed through the tripartite sequential assignments between Grameen Foundation, Mifos Foundation and Apache Software Foundation?
Have the governance board members of Mifos Foundation taken cognisance off any objections to the assignment of Intellectual Property rights between Mifos Foundation and Apache Software Foundation?
Have the governance board members of Apache Software Foundation taken cognisance off any objections and breach of public trust in regards to the assignment between Mifos Foundation and Apache Software Foundation?
Have the governance board members of Grameen Foundation taken cognisance off any objections and breach of public trust in regards to the assignment between COSM and Mifos Foundation?
Are there instances of contributions/submissions of code, triage and documentation to the project, without the original author(s) having signed a CLA, and the work is submitted under the false pretexts, title or author origins? If Yes, please list the PRs here, and list the contents of PMC Board Report, highlighting the PMC’s cognisance of such contributions, where the contributions are listed under the false name/author/origins?