Case Study 1

 Objective

Document and publish observation findings and recommend best practices, and public policy reforms to regulatory bodies.

This public discussion covers

general protection of volunteer contributions in different jurisdictions,

Best practices for diversity and inclusion in case study

Best practices for SBOM

Best practices for maintainability of security infrastructure of open source software

Best practices for Intellectual Property clarification

Best practices for data protection and processing

Best practices for open source software: Project Lifecycle governance.

 

 Assessment on public case studies of open source software for Micro-finance

 

To extrapolate the mission of documenting best practices for open source software, we have considered making assessments based on observations and findings on the open source softwares for heavily regulated banking.

Case Study Description:

Intellectual Property Lifecycle Management and transfer,

Assignment of components of open source software distribution(s) known as Open MF, then Mifos X and presently Apache Fineract

Grameen Foundation>The Community for Open Source Microfinance (COSM), Grameen Foundation>MifosX, Mifos Foundation>Apache Fineract, Apache Software Foundation

 

This case study concerns IP assignment in US jurisdiction, and the Observations are recorded by running necessary checks for breach of public trust, and private party influence on public trust projects.

This case study also concerns availability, IP clarification and export controls on the open source software to regulated banking entities outside USA.

Legal Bodies Involved:
Grameen Foundation, USA,
Mifos Foundation, USA,
Apache Software Foundation, USA,

Financial Institutions(both within and outside USA) with a production grade instance of Apache Fineract 1.x

 

Watch the knowledge space here Case Study 1: MifosX/ApacheFineract1.x

 

 

Maintained by Muellners Foundation, Denmark